Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1
FOX News
Jul 2, 2011 11:00am EDT
circumstantial. i think it was a big mistake for the judge. we were not trying to prove caylee was dead. we knew she was dead. she was in the trunk, she was in the trunk. >> there is no one brighter on it. it is not pure review. colleagues haven't reviewed it. doctor, bright guy and phd. but he is a research scientist and not a forensic scientist. this was never testified before in a homicide trial. saying we'll execute the young woman for the death of the child based on untested nonpeer review testimony not seen in florida before, and say because of smell avision. i know the smell of death and at the same time prosecution seeking to introduce the jury and smell the can and convict here. and it is not junk science. and in the minority at the table . i have esteemed advocates. but i am comfortable that is not reversible error and the jury can consider it and disregard it. you put it all together. even if it was an error. it would be harmless. others have looked at it. there is peer review. >> i agree . going forward. do we want jurors and judges and prosecutors to say. >> i thought you said it is
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1